Using Metasearch to create demand is a good idea, but is just too costly and risky for many hotels. They just do not have the budgets to compete with the OTA´s. The independent hotel ROI model is different from an OTA’s ROI model. In meta search advertising, it is David versus Goliath, except this time Goliath wins ninety-nine times out of a hundred. The cost of sale will be pushed down by this added competition. In Europe where we already see that hotels are now not legally obliged to offer rate parity to OTA´s. We will see revenue managers increase their pricing where the cost of sale is higher. Likewise with these two major players entering the market and especially with Google´s dominance in mobile search this is likely force other players to reduce their % to maintain market share. OTAs are necessary for attracting clients to your hotel. The real trick is siphoning traffic from OTA’s and getting them to book on your website. This is where hotels have a major opportunity for getting some payback after years of feeding the OTA beast. Get the full story at the Hotelient Blog Read also "Why “Book on Google” and “TripAdvisor Instant Booking” are bad for hoteliers"